from the Omaha Reader
-
Archives
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- September 2017
- August 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- August 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- September 2013
- May 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- September 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
- April 2002
- January 2002
- February 2000
- January 2000
- December 1999
- November 1999
- October 1999
- September 1999
- August 1999
- April 1999
-
Meta
Neal, I’m a little slow today, so I’m going to ask…do you support cutting this funding? The money being spent is really quite trivial, especially when you compare it to Medicaid payments made for reconstructive breast surgery on victims of breast cancer…which the state of Nebraska is not required to provide, but does anyway. Such surgery is also NOT medically necessary.
I guess we’re lucky to be young and virile…I highly doubt that we’d be walking around with such big smiles if our ‘little men’ couldn’t ‘rise to the task’.
Hey Mike, glad to see you make the trip over here.
I don’t think it’s as simple as the cartoon necessarily makes it out to be; I realize that men with that deficiency aren’t just looking to make babies they can’t afford. I do agree that there should be some kind of symmetry for the services that are provided without mandate or necessity. The initial story I read about this said how ED can lead to serious depression and marital problems, so I absolutely can see the argument for it.
One bit of hesitation comes from the awareness that there are people who are so opposed to any kind of government aid for poor people that they’ll latch onto services like this as a way of caricaturing and turning people against the legitimate and important role played by Medicaid.
If it were entirely up to me, I’d absolutely keep the funding in place. Ultimately, for this cartoon, my bleeding heart was overridden by the observation of something that seems so Darwinian in nature — “This is weird … I can’t afford to take care of myself … and now my reproductive organs aren’t doing their job … hmm …” It allowed for another appearance of Darwin and his Space Monkey (previously seen here), which I couldn’t resist.
Fair enough, I just wasn’t sure of the intent. I do love the space monkey.
That’s me in that space suit, isn’t it.
I’m shocked, without explanation, this cartoon reads like some radical social-Darwinist tract.
I see what you’re trying to say, but, uh wow.
Hey j, I’m not sure what you think I’m trying to say, if you think what I’m trying to say requires explanation.
You don’t see anything cruel/social darwinist about suggesting poor people are getting ED,–or rather not being able to afford ED treatment–because they’re unfit to pass on their genetics?
Oh yeah, that definitely sounds cruel. I just didn’t know what your initial interpretation of the cartoon was.