from the Omaha Reader
-
Archives
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- September 2017
- August 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- August 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- September 2013
- May 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- September 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
- April 2002
- January 2002
- February 2000
- January 2000
- December 1999
- November 1999
- October 1999
- September 1999
- August 1999
- April 1999
-
Meta
I’ve never heard anyone make the claim that African-Americans (don’t want the PC police on my ass) are tyrants who are keeping the white man down. That doesn’t mean nobody has made the claim, but I sure as heck haven’t heard it. It may be hard for you to fathom, but many of the people supporting the NCRI just want to give government and businesses the ability to choose the most qualified candidate with no consideration given in either direction towards race or gender.
Suppose a business owner has two equally, and I mean truly equally, qualified candidates for a job. One is African-American, the other is white (aka Caucasian-American). Is it racist if the white business owner chooses the white candidate? What if the consideration wasn’t made based on race, but because they attended the same alma-mater. Or maybe they both have the same interests and hobbies. That road runs both ways too…maybe the boss chooses the African-American for those same aforementioned reasons. Should the boss be obligated to choose someone with whom he shares no similarities, hobbies, or interests? You don’t have to like someone to work well with them, but I think it helps.
As far as the state trooper goes…I don’t know what to make of that. Part of me says that, if there’s no evidence that his prejudice affected his work performance, then he shouldn’t have been fired. But on the other hand, as a law enforcement agent and a representative of the Nebraska State Patrol, any perception of racism or discrimination would open the state up to lawsuits…and these people should hold themselves to higher standards. There’s a police officer that lives in Hickman, and outside of his job, he’s a locally renowned waterfowler. I’ve never met him in person, but through various conversations we shared on a hunting forum, I formed a poor opinion of him. In Nebraska, it’s state law that you can’t sell a puppy younger than 8 weeks old, and when people would post puppies for sale in the buy/sell portion of the forum…I would usually make it a point to remind them of that fact. This officer, on the other hand, would often get defensive and accusatory, telling me it’s not my place to play armchair quarterback by trying to enforce the law. I would kindly respond that he’s right, it’s actually HIS job to do so…as an officer and as moderator of that part of the forum. Naturally, he didn’t take it well…having his professionalism called into question. I think the reason he avoided saying anything is because, as a dog breeder himself, he didn’t want to take care of the pups any longer than he had to, and his clients always wanted the pups ASAP. The reason I tell this story is that I see a similarity. Both stories beg the question…what are you? Are you an officer, or a dog breeder? Are you a patrolman, or a racist? I truly don’t see how anybody can separate what they do from who they are…and I would have a hard time believing that anyone associated with the KKK could provide even-handed justice to those who break the law.
Let’s be honest about this, Mike — this ban doesn’t affect businesses. It only affects state institutions, many of which have voluntarily chosen to have these hiring practices put in place because they think they are best for the institution and the people they serve. Nobody is stopping businesspeople from hiring whomever they want. This ban stops institutions like the university from making hiring decisions they have chosen. So your hypothetical situation about the business owner, beyond being nothing more than anecdotal evidence at best, is simply irrelevant. If we want to talk about laws taking the choice out of the employer’s hands, banning affirmative action quite clearly does that.
What this boils down to is that people think black people and other minorities are unfairly getting the jobs that white people should be getting. You know as well as I do that there are plenty of people who support this ban because they’re convinced that black people only get jobs that white people are screwed out of. If you spent more than 60 seconds around one of the petition gatherers, you surely know what I’m talking about. That obviously doesn’t include all supporters of the ban, but the KKK hasn’t supported similar bans elsewhere because they’ve suddenly become the anti-discrimination organization. This petition drive is helped greatly by resentment that somebody (black) is getting handed something that belongs to someone else (who is white).
Again, the whole argument that “business owners should be able to hire the most qualified candidate” is good, and if there were some kind of statewide affirmative action policy imposed on all private businesses you’d have a point and I’d most likely agree with you, but that argument simply doesn’t apply to this ban at all.
That stinks about that Hickman cop. Good for you for standing up to him. It’s very disheartening to see police officers abusing their authority. My wife and I were out one night and saw two cops having a blast trying to convince drunk people to walk into oncoming traffic by lying to them about the walk signs. The cops thought it was hilarious. Fortunately, no one was hurt (at least while we were there). I was also leaving a bar in Omaha one night when a road crew was repainting a crosswalk at 1 a.m. A cop car stopped on the new paint and then peeled out, smearing the new lines and making a mess of the work these guys had just done (not that any of this is relevant to the state trooper).