-
Archives
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- September 2017
- August 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- August 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- September 2013
- May 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- September 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
- April 2002
- January 2002
- February 2000
- January 2000
- December 1999
- November 1999
- October 1999
- September 1999
- August 1999
- April 1999
-
Meta
[...] posted with permission From NEALO.COM [...]
Then you should probably feel bad you weren’t able to do this on your own, without the false manipulation.
And you should come to understand that your message of tolerance should include any of the right wing, tea party, bitter white guys, Christian people that you may have thought ill of, or spoken against during your demonstration.
And maybe look a bit more into how well your critical thinking, critical analysis led you down a path that many other people, liberals even, thought looked suspicious from the get go for many rational reasons.
And consider how poorly the media covered this story since the media should have been perhaps the first to report critically (in the best sense of the word) about this.
And how easy it is for you to be manipulated by others. Consider how easy it was for you to be manipulated and think back to other times when others, including the government, have tried to manipulate all of us. 9/11, War on Iraq, sure those are easy. Think deeper about other times peoples have allowed themselves to be manipulated and you were moved enough to demonstrate. Maybe you were wrong then too, and maybe your demonstrations helped buttress some truly evil stuff? Could that have happened to you?
I apologize for the duplicate post, I was trying to eliminate a word I thought may have triggered the moderation queue. This hoax is being discussed at FARK today, I won’t post the link because I want to post another link, and I don’t want to be considered by WordPress to be a spammer.
But here is an article in Inside Higher Ed about Hate Crime Hoaxes from July 31, 2012
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/07/31/hate-crime-hoaxes-present-burdens-lessons-college-campuses
It’s an interesting article and gives even more perspectives on your cartoon….
neal replied:
August 22nd, 2012 at 9:00 am
No problem — I have it set up where I have to approve a person’s first post, and I just hadn’t gotten to yours yet. I couldn’t tell from a glance if there was a difference between the two, so I just approved both in case there happened to be a meaningful difference. Want me to take down the first one?
Sal who saw your piece at FARK replied:
August 22nd, 2012 at 9:09 am
Sure, that’s fine. And sincerely, thank you for being so courteous about it all. The FARK discussion, which contains a lot of FARK inside politics itself and can be very rude, but like so many such discussions can be enlightening and educational (and addictive) is here: http://www.fark.com/comments/7280696/When-faking-an-attack-on-yourself-to-bring-LGBT-community-together-you-might-want-to-do-more-studying-than-old-CSI-episodes.
Anyway, Sal, to get to your first post, it’s probably kind of easy to project onto these demonstrations based on what one might expect to hear, evidenced by your reference to the people that may have been spoken against at the demonstration.
These gatherings were overwhelmingly positive. The comments and speeches and signs were of support and concern, not retaliation. It’s easy for someone to sit there and urge restraint while assuming these demonstrations were something they weren’t, but they were remarkably restrained, mature and positive.
A city heard word that someone had been brutally assaulted. The people’s response was not to attack; their response was to recognize that others within this city were now terrified something like that could happen to them, and they gathered to tell the rest of the city “That type of violence is not Lincoln. Don’t be afraid.” The skepticism surrounding the initial story was probably more widespread than you realize, but that didn’t mean the fear that resulted and the concern for loved ones was any less real.
It was a beautiful response then, and it still is now.
The accuser’s actions will no doubt have implications, and they will probably damage the cause that she was trying to help. But that’s a separate issue. She is going to have her day in court and what will happen will happen. Some people are ashamed and embarrassed that they were duped and that they came out in support of something that now appears to have been made up. My belief is that they should be proud.
I’m glad you made the comparison to the “manipulation” surrounding 9/11. I’m kind of surprised you think peaceful vigils in a park are analogous to attacking brown-skinned people on the street, vandalizing Mosques, invading another country or voting for the Patriot Act, but the comparison is useful for the contrast. Had these folks gone out and burned a church or the local Tea Party headquarters or whatever, that would be very different and I’d agree with the condemnation.
But they didn’t. And so I don’t.