Commenters get it
Lincolnite Dwayne Ball’s Thursday letter to the editor at the Journal Star accused my Sunday cartoon of reaching “a new low” thanks to what he describes as a “personal,” “mean-spirited” and “ad hominem” attack. He claims that the information Marc Schniederjans withheld is well-known and could easily be compiled.
The problem is, Ball and other defenders of Schniederjans seem to imply that Schniederjans was simply withholding the names of the faculty members who were hired without searches, and that this information he referred to is some kind of indisputable fact. But that’s not what Schniederjans said. He said “…the University of Nebraska, in effort to get as many minorities as they possibly can, have hired people that didn’t cut it.”
He also said the University uses opportunity money “to bribe department chairs,” and he suggested recruiters should “…get off their butts and start working and hire some people who are really high-quality African Americans,” which is not subtle in its implication that the University is hiring people who are low-quality African Americans. He added that the “basic idea in recruiting people is to find people who certainly meet the minimum requirements … it has been my observation on this campus that that is not the case.”
The details of which faculty members are unqualified for their jobs is what Schniederjans wouldn’t disclose, and that assertion was hardly accepted as fact by the Academic Senate. Throughout the debate, several professors openly disagreed with Schniederjans’ assertion, saying that their departments “always sought to hire the best person” and “in no case have we not hired the best person.” One member of the audience told Schniederjans that if he has evidence of bribery occurring, he needs to bring it forward or stop using such inflammatory statements (Schniederjans admitted he classifies opportunity money as “bribery;” the questioner slammed Schniederjans for having such a poor understanding of opportunity hires). So for Schniederjans’ defenders to act as if his undisclosed information is widely available, easily discoverable and indisputable is simply untrue.
(more…)







