Adrian Smith fears blogs (UPDATED!)

8 Responses to Adrian Smith fears blogs (UPDATED!)

1. PP says:

   November 4, 2007 at 11:45 pm

   Adrian Smith, who apparently knows the Beatrice Fiddler uses typepad.

   LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

   [Reply]
2. Alaasface.Com » Adrian Smith fears blogs says:

   November 5, 2007 at 2:01 am

   [...] unknown wrote an interesting post today on Adrian Smith fears blogsHere’s a quick excerpt [...]
3. GovTrends says:

   November 5, 2007 at 3:42 pm

   To whom it may concern,

   GovTrends is the official website vendor for Nebraska’s Third District Congressman Adrian Smith. As a disclaimer, we are a bi-partisan technology vendor providing web services to many congressional offices. We are very concerned with the misunderstanding that has been brought to our attention by Congressman Smith’s office.

   We were contacted by the congressman’s office regarding the problem bloggers on Blogspot were having linking to the congressman’s website. Upon further investigation we discovered our servers were set by default to block all referring traffic from Blogspot due to the proliferation of spammers. So, in effect, this ‘blocking’ of Blogspot is affecting all of the websites on our server – both Democrat and Republican. To be clear, neither us nor our client were aware of the blocking being done prior to today (we have over 2000 different websites on our blacklist that we download from gotroot.com) and we apologize for any inconvenience this has caused Blogspot bloggers.

   We are currently researching a solution that will relieve this situation as soon as possible. If we feel that Blogspot does not pose a spamming threat to any of our clients’ websites or our servers, we will allow its incoming traffic. Again, we apologize for the inconvenience this has caused and hope to have this resolved soon.

   Best Regards,
   GovTrends
   Website Design Studio

   [Reply]
4. Lisa says:

   November 5, 2007 at 6:06 pm

   They’ve been busy little beavers!!

   Here’s the kicker. I called them, and they refused to give a list of the other members of congress they serve. They claimed it’s automatic due to spam.

   I tested all the corporations website and their own, linking from blogspot.com. THEY ALL WENT THROUGH JUST FINE.

   So, that leads to the question: Is this automatic blocking only occuring on servers for members of Congress? Is that even believable? And just how many members of Congress do they actually work for since they’re not providing a list?

   [Reply]
5. neal says:

   November 5, 2007 at 8:26 pm

   Haha, so they claim that they automatically block blogger accounts because apparently the spam is so bad, yet they don’t even block it on their own site? Nice try, GovTrends!

   [Reply]
6. GovTrends says:

   November 6, 2007 at 8:35 am

   Hello,

   Our role at GovTrends is to provide our client’s on both sides of the aisle websites that are safe and accessible by everyone on the Internet.

   We, here at GovTrends, want to give you and your readers an accurate explanation of what is happening with the Blogspot refer links.

   Servers have different requirements – some are less strict then others. There are dozens of servers hosting congressional website, each with different requirements because of various website vendors and differing technologies.

   How does this affect congressional websites? Every congressional website has email forms that can, with enough effort, be highjacked by spam robots to be used to send spam through congressional servers to random people. Our goal is to minimize this type of spam by blocking potential threats.

   Due to strict security requirements and high volume of ‚Äúspider‚Äù generated spam congressional websites receive, we use the blacklist definitions of gotroots.com as they are reputable for providing security config files. In the case of the ‚Äúblacklist config‚Äù file, line 7060 – blocks refers from ” #SecFilterSelective HTTP_Referer|ARGS www.*\.blogspot due to spamming issues.

   Add the link http://www.joinadrian.com/ to your blogspot account and you will see the site. It’s a different server, different vendor, runs different technology, just more prone to spam.

   We are currently unblocking blogspot temperately for our congressional clients, and will monitor refers and traffic. Should these refer links cause harm or increased amounts of spider spam, we will review and block the http refers again WITHOUT WARNING. This decision is ours as our number one priority is security for all our congressional clients. Again, we apologize for the inconvenience this has caused.

   Best Regards,
   GovTrends
   Network Support

   [Reply]
7. Paul C. Jacobs says:

   November 6, 2007 at 9:18 am

   This is just another case of somebody not checking their facts and running with something just to create a story to smear someone.

   GET A JOB!

   [Reply]
8. neal says:

   November 6, 2007 at 4:25 pm

   Hi Paul,
   If you clicked on any of the links I’ve provided, you’ll see no shortage of people who phoned directly to both Adrian Smith’s office and GovTrends attempting to get the facts and were unable to get any information out of either.
   GovTrends only communicates by way of these one-way comment posts, and Adrian Smith’s office simply doesn’t respond. As Hannah added at NNN,

   This actually proved a good example of what WILL happen every time Adrian Smith and his staff continue with the policy of refusing to communicate.

   For the last 10 months, Smith and his staff have made it clear through their actions that they will NOT answer questions, or provide anything else to those that question Smith’s actions. They refuse to a return phone calls (with the exception of once since they learned what I was doing), they refuse to answer letters and emails, they refuse to provide publicly available reports that they have to send out for those who don’t live in the DC area. They block access to Smith unless it’s on their terms, they create scenarios where he’s only presented in a certain light.

   In other words, what you see and what you perceive is severely controlled.

   In trying to figure out at the website issue, nothing came from Smith’s office. Not a word. Given their history of negative actions, one was only left with speculation. Every time I’ve tried to get their side of a story, and tried to be fair….Nothing.

   [Reply]