U-T gets rid of Bob Kittle

Voice of San Diego’s Rob Davis describes Kittle’s legacy as the Union-Tribune‘s former editorial page editor:

“He was very liberal with the facts,” [Councilmember and former mayoral candidate Donna] Frye said. “And had a great disregard for truth. Name-calling goes with the territory. That doesn’t bother me. But what bothered me was the absolute lack of factual information. When facts are deliberately tortured, that’s not ethical journalism.”

More recently, Kittle engaged in few battles that were as vitriolic as his fight with Mike Aguirre, the former city attorney. The irony in their sometimes petulant squabbles: Kittle had endorsed Aguirre in 2004. That was a short romance.

They clashed over pension issues. They clashed over Sanders’ proposed reforms. And as in many knock-down fights, they clashed over the irrelevant, such an Aguirre aide’s use of foul language. Aguirre eventually started his own blog, largely dedicated to refuting Kittle editorials.

One 2007 editorial accused Aguirre of violating campaign finance laws. The local Republican Party jumped on the news. GOP officials marched into the City Clerk’s Office — TV cameras watching closely — to file an ethics complaint against Aguirre.

But the editorial’s accusation was baseless.

Contrasts in dissent

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), who opposes the House and Senate health care bills:

“It does us no good to incite fear in people by saying that there’s these end-of-life provisions, these death panels,” Murkowski, a Republican, said. “Quite honestly, I’m so offended at that terminology because it absolutely isn’t (in the bill). There is no reason to gin up fear in the American public by saying things that are not included in the bill.”

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), considered by folks like Ben Nelson, Max Baucus, Kent Conrad and Barack Obama to be a good-faith negotiator and key player in the quest to develop a bipartisan health compromise:

“There is some fear because in the House bill, there is counseling for end-of-life,” Grassley said. “And from that standpoint, you have every right to fear. […] We should not have a government program that determines if you’re going to pull the plug on grandma.”

That ‘competitive’ poll

The results of a recent Gallup survey showing Nebraska shifting from “lean Republican” to “competitive” have generated some discussion, particularly centered around the surprising percentages of Nebraskan who claim to favor Democrats and those who favor Republicans.

Here’s a comparison between the poll results, 2008 voter registration numbers and 2008 presidential election results:

Gallup survey results:
Respondents favoring Democrats: 43%
Respondents favoring Republicans: 42%
Neither / other: 15%

2008 Voter Registration:
Democrats: 34% (393,468)
Republicans: 49% (558,308)
Independents: 17% (195,459)

2008 Presidential Election Results:
Barack Obama: 42% (333,319)
John McCain: 57% (452,979)

Naturally, as outlined in Don Walton’s Journal Star story, different sides are going to have different reactions to these results, but all of the response I’ve seen seems to focus on the surge in Democrats’ numbers — whether they’re a sign of a shift in Nebraskans’ attitudes or an already-outdated relic of post-election enthusiasm. For example, there’s this recent post at Lincolnite.com, in which Mr. Wilson said

The data come from the first six months of 2009. The first few months of that period were marked by heavy Obamaphilia; skepticism and cynicism are now setting in. I suspect data from the second half of 2009 won’t be quite as favorable.

In the discussion about the accuracy of the apparent nine percent gain for Democrats, no one seems to be mentioning that there is a near inverse seven percent drop for Republicans. I can see Obama enthusiasm pulling self-identifiers from the Independent / Other category to Democrats, which it may be doing, but notice that the Independent / Other breakdown between registration and self-identification is fairly steady (17% to 15%). The obvious assumption would be that seven percent of Republicans shifted to that “other” 15%, choosing to not identify themselves with their party, and I don’t think Obama enthusiasm can tell that whole story.

But let’s say Mr. Wilson (who echoes the thoughts of Republican Chairman Mark Fahleson) is correct, and the shift is temporary Obama enthusiasm. If that assessment is accurate, it would demonstrate a relationship between Obama approval and party identification that hasn’t existed nationally.
Continue reading

Birthers’ originals – Aug 6, 2009

from the Lincoln Journal Star

barack obama birth certificate

Some friends pointed out to me that the Daily Show made a similar joke. I was leaning toward pulling the cartoon because of that, but after viewing the video the folks at the LJS decided the cartoon was different enough to still be worth running. Maybe this incident will help keep me off my high horse the next time another big cartoonist groupthink moment happens.

But speaking of groupthink, Nebraska StatePaper.com publisher David Hahn decided to enter the birtharena yesterday. Just a word of warning to potential birthers — offering a defensive disclaimer that you’ll probably get labeled a birther doesn’t make your birtherism any less birtherrific.

You know you’re in for a treat when a column includes a line like “We have not checked sources, but there are reports that some witnessed his birth in Kenya.” On its own, a line like that seems lazy and irresponsible. It’s downright jaw-dropping when you consider that kind of recklessness is part of a column about getting the facts out and setting the record straight.

Hahn offers up what I like to call Sensible Birtherism™ — you distance yourself from the actual birthers, even perhaps suggesting you’re above the fray, yet you still legitimize and advance their claims by acting as if there is still a legitimate issue. The most popular version of this is “Obama should be doing more to respond to these critics.” You get to pretend as if you’re detached and objective, yet you — like the birthers — still choose to ignore the most significant facts — that Obama has provided proof, he has allowed reputable third parties to see the proof and he already has responded to the conspiracy theorists (see FighttheSmears.com, the website he set up during the campaign in an attempt to set the record straight regarding various baseless conspiracy theories) — and none of that is good enough.

And even if he were to release his original birth certificate and send it around the country to each individual birther to inspect, that would still be insufficient. Alex Koppelman at Salon points out that birthers have come up with an 18-point list of proof demands beyond the original, and prominent birthers like Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage started casting preemptive doubts on the original document starting back in October 2008.

UPDATE: David Hahn responded to Kyle Michaelis’s post on the topic at NewNebraska.net.

What they’re up against

from a Washington Post story on champion fearmonger Jim DeMint:

In other pockets of the state, the reaction to Democratic proposals has been strong, too. At a recent town-hall meeting in suburban Simpsonville, a man stood up and told Rep. Robert Inglis (R-S.C.) to “keep your government hands off my Medicare.”

“I had to politely explain that, ‘Actually, sir, your health care is being provided by the government,’ ” Inglis recalled. “But he wasn’t having any of it.”

Decayed

Nearly ten years ago I began going down a path that I never thought would last this long. My stint as the Daily Nebraskan’s editorial cartoonist began on August 23, 1999, and, while there have been some gaps here and there, I’m now less than a month from that ten-year anniversary. I’ve tossed around a few ideas on how to celebrate that milestone — a new book collection, a gallery show, some sort of blog-based retrospective, retirement — but really haven’t settled on anything. More than likely, as the day grows closer, I’ll just forget about it like I did with the ten year anniversary of my actual debut. But if any of you folks have ideas on something fun I could do to celebrate ten years in this unexpected career, please share.