from the San Diego Reader
-
Archives
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- September 2017
- August 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- August 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- September 2013
- May 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- September 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
- April 2002
- January 2002
- February 2000
- January 2000
- December 1999
- November 1999
- October 1999
- September 1999
- August 1999
- April 1999
-
Meta
Good stuff…and very true. I don’t think it’s the occupation of one’s hands that creates the problem, it’s the pre-occupation of the mind, and a hands-free device doesn’t really remedy that problem.
I’m also intrigued by these bans on texting while driving. I don’t text while I drive because there is nothing so important to send my friends via text that I can’t wait til I get out of my vehicle. I think such a ban might be a good idea…but how would you ever enforce it?
Me: “No officer, I wasn’t texting, I was just dialing!”
Officer: “Oh, okay then, move it along, nothing to see here…”
Man, Mike, did they ban your LJS.com access at work? Don’t get me wrong, I’m not complaining at all, I’m just kind of surprised to see you commenting here so much. Keep it coming.
When a bill came up in the Unicameral a few years ago to ban talking on cell phones while driving, it actually said that texting was okay. Thank goodness that didn’t pass. That’s even stupider than California’s ban.
So I just found out about your site. I live in SF now and let me tell you that this ban is the biggest load of bs I’ve seen in a bit. First of all the drivers here are retarded in general. Right of way is apparently a suggestion, not a way to ease decisions on the road. The point is the ban isn’t going to make people better drivers, just another “what if” scenario that managed to get people to buy products that make them look like a douche in public. Not the first law-created racket. Smog check anyone?